The allegations by members of the  Ghana Liquefied Petroleum Gas Operators Association (GLiPGOA) that the National Petroleum Authority’s (NPA’s) recent shutdown of T-Terkpor Gas Refilling Station is an attempt to destroy local investments for multinationals to takeover has been treated with a pinch of salt.

T-Terkpor Gas Refilling Station has dragged NPA to court for shutting down the station at Afariwa Junction in the Ashaiman Municipality.

The decision to shut down the station followed the Multi Stakeholders’ Committee (MSC) recommendations and a petition by Charles Kissi, the Assembly Member of the Area to the Energy Ministry to close down the facility because of the danger it poses to two adjoining schools-Tema International School and Tema Ridge School.

But the Torgbe Adaku V, President of CLiPGOA noted that NPA activated this agenda when instead of helping find a lasting solution to some of the hazards of handling LPG rather shockingly decided on collapsing all their stations across the country with the introduction of a Cylinder Recirculation Model although this has been known to be a rather more dangerous policy whose effects in several countries across the world has been disastrous.

The NPA, in a statement issued by the Corporate Affairs Division has accused CLiPGOA of sabotaging the National LPG Policy.

“The NPA is aware of the attempts by GLiPGOA to undermine the entire National LPG Policy, which will not only create additional jobs but increase public safety in the downstream sector,” the statement said.

According to the statement, the allegations by Torgbe Adaku V and CLiPGOA members are vile, defamatory, threatening and a deliberate attempt to sacrifice public safety for personal financial gains.

Read Full Statement Below:

REJOINDER: HALT THE RECKLESS VICTIMISATION OF OUR BUSINESSES IMMEDIATELY.

The attention of the National Petroleum Authority (NPA) has been drawn to a statement read at a press conference by members of the Ghana LPG Operators Association (GLiPGOA), on January 16, 2019. The statement, signed by Torgbe Adaku V, among other claims, accused the NPA of an “agenda to consciously sabotage and collapse” their “businesses,” while paving the way for “giant multinational companies” and “cronies to set up liquefied petroleum gas bottling plants across the country…”

Again, GLiPGOA claims recent risk assessment conducted by the NPA at various LPG stations across the country, as part of the implementation of the Cylinder Recirculation Model, a policy which has the full backing of the President of the Republic and his Cabinet, as well as most consumers of petroleum products, is an attempt to shut down stations of its members on the “mere whims and caprices of so called petitioners whose chief complaint has been that gas stations have been sited close to their facilities, whether schools or homes contrary to the grounds on which an applicant may be denied a license under the NPA Act.”

According to the statement, Goby Gas Station and T-Tekpor Gas Station have been specifically targeted by the NPA.

The NPA as a Regulator operates within the law and is mandated to ensure that operations in the sector are conducted in a safe and standardized manner, and stations in breach of safety standards will be sanctioned after due process to ensure public safety.

The NPA respects the rule of law and the work of the judiciary and awaits the outcome of the court action been filed by T-Terkpor.

That said, the NPA wishes to categorically deny the allegations made by Torgbe Adaku V and members of GLiPGOA. The allegations are vile, defamatory, threatening and a deliberate attempt to sacrifice public safety for personal financial gains.

The NPA is aware of the attempts by GLiPGOA to undermine the entire National LPG Policy, which will not only create additional jobs but increase public safety in the downstream sector. The NPA has a duty of care to the general public and that will always guide our operations.

The NPA wishes to reiterate its commitment to working with players in the industry to ensure the implementation of the Cylinder Recirculation policy as directed by the Government. We shall however not give in to threats from any individual or bodies seeking to undermine our work.

Signed

Corporate Affairs Division

—CBOD News

 

Members of the Ghana Liquefied Petroleum Gas Operators Association (GLiPGOA) have asked the National Petroleum Authority to halt the reckless victimization of their businesses. 

According to a press statement issued by the group, the NPA has been sabotaging their activities in the interest of some multinational companies.

“The National Petroleum Authority’s apparent agenda to consciously sabotage and collapse our businesses for the giant multinational companies and themselves and their cronies to set up liquefied petroleum gas bottling plants across the country has been activated in full force” the statement reads. 

The group said, the NPA, instead of focusing on helping them to solve the many hazards in the industry, is rather using the introduction of a Cylinder Recirculation Model to sabotage them.

“We have noted with deep concern what appears to be an emerging pattern of closing down stations on the mere whimsies and caprices of so called ‘petitioners’ whose chief complaint has been that gas stations have been sited close to their facilities whether schools or homes contrary to the grounds on which an applicant may be denied a license under the NPA act” its read. 

READ FULL STATEMENT BELOW

HALT THE RECKLESS VICTIMISATION OF OUR BUSINESSES IMMEDIATELY

Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the press and thank you for honouring our invitation to today’s press conference at such short notice.

The Ghana LPG Operators Association (GLiPGOA) which is the umbrella union of LPG Operators across the country have today invited you here to put on record our utmost displeasure at the vile attempts by politicians and people in authority to simply collapse our businesses and render our investments and employees jobless in the next few months if the grand agenda set in motion by assigns of the National Petroleum Authority is not immediately curtailed forthwith.

The National Petroleum Authority’s apparent agenda to consciously sabotage and collapse our businesses for the giant multinational companies and themselves and their cronies to set up liquefied petroleum gas bottling plants across the country has been activated in full force.

The National Petroleum Authority activated this agenda when instead of helping find a lasting solution to some of the hazards of handling LPG rather shockingly decided on collapsing all our stations across the country with the introduction of a Cylinder Recirculation Model although this has been known to be a rather more dangerous policy whose effects in several countries across the world has been disastrous and is there for all to see.

This recirculation policy obviously is not a new thing to our Ghanaian system as it has been practised in this country in the late 80s but had to be eventually abandoned because of a myriad of factors.

We have noted with deep concern what appears to be an emerging pattern of closing down stations on the mere whimsies and caprices of so called ‘petitioners’ whose chief complaint has been that gas stations have been sited close to their facilities whether schools or homes contrary to the grounds on which an applicant may be denied a license under the NPA act.

Ladies and gentlemen you will be surprised these are stations that have existed for years, and had the licenses renewed year on year until the surfacing of these so called petitioners .One such station is Goby Gas Station, located 300 meters from the ACP junction off the Accra Kumasi Highway, which came into existence in 2006, fulfilled all documentations and started its retail activities in October 2008 till 12 January 2017 when a so called high profile personality said the station was close to his house so NPA should shut it down.

The NPA did, and till this day that station remains shut down. This very act itself smacks of incompetence on the part of a regulator who is supposed to know what they are doing.

The NPA in December of last year also for no good reason other than a supposed report filed by one of its hirelings put out a report suggesting it has decided to close down one of the very modern and very safe LPG refill outlets around the Afariwa area called T-Tekpor Gas Station (said to be a category A station, ie highest standards of safety) because according to the authority, the said station is sited close to a school and other public places.

These LPG refilling stations for the records were there way back before these other facilities were erected but is being treated as though the reverse was the case.
We all know this principle that is being pushed by the NPA if should be applied will mean that virtually 80-90% of all LPG stations across the length and breadth of the country will have to be demolished or non-renewal of their licenses as the authority is suggesting.

It is clear, that the NPA is only intending on using all manner of funny, ridiculous and untenable excuses to push us all and our investments out of business and to further render our employees jobless with the shutting down of our stations for no good reason other than to satisfy the whims and caprices of those in charge in order to make way for their money induced cylinder recirculation model programme to take off.

We will want to put on record that this deliberate attempt to tag all our stations and operations as unsafe simply because of one or two incidents cannot be allowed to continue whilst we all sit and watch some politicians who hitherto to coming into office had no clue what stresses it takes for ordinary Ghanaians to put these stations together only for them to come and collapse and go home to enjoy whatever they make from delivering the system to some foreigners and their cronies in the name of some model. 

SAFETY PROPOSALS TO CURB GAS FIRE INCIDENTS

In the light of the challenges faced by the LPG industry on fire incidence, GLiPGOA has put together `Safety Proposals` and submitted same to the Ministry of Energy and NPA to curb the fire incidents, we hope the Ministry and NPA will
incorporate these `Safety Proposals` in the LPG Operations. This will ensure that the nation does not experience incidents like the Atomic gas explosion.

Ladies and gentlemen of the press, we will like to use this opportunity to warn the NPA to immediately, shelve whatever ridiculous plans they have kicked in motion to destroy our investments across the country and to also immediately do the right thing by reinstating those targeted whose licenses the NPA is revoking for no just reason other than to make way for their money baby….
We are advising NPA to reopen with immediate effect and automatic alacrity T-Tekpor Gas Station and Goby Gas and any other station they have closed down within one week otherwise we shall advise ourselves.

We are ready to resist with our blood to safeguard Public Safety and our Businesses.

We further call on the President of the republic of Ghana to as a matter of urgency call to order some of his appointees who are simply destroying and collapsing businesses instead of helping build and empower same.

Thank you 

Signed

Torgbi Adaku V

—Ghanaweb

Russia’s production and exports of coal hit last year their highest levels since 2013, according to S&P Global Platts estimates of data from Russia’s Energy Ministry.

Russian coal exports increased last year by 3.4 percent compared to 2017, to reach 191 million mt—the highest level since S&P Global Platts started collecting data on Russia’s coal industry in 2013.

Coal production also reached its highest level since 2013—at 431.76 million mt, Russia’s production increased by 6 percent in 2018 compared to 2017. 

According to Platts estimates and to thermal coal traders who spoke to Platts, Russian producers continue to seek domination on the European market and have been putting in a lot of effort to grab more market shares on the Asian markets such as South Korea and Taiwan.

Last year, the average free on board (FOB) coal prices for the Atlantic and Pacific markets were both higher compared to 2017, which could be a big incentive for Russia to continue producing and exporting more coal to seaborne destinations, according to Platts.

Russia’s Energy Minister Alexander Novak briefed on Thursday President Vladimir Putin on the Russian energy sector production in 2018, saying that the coal production of around 433 million tons was planned to be reached in 2020. Russia plans to invest around US$22.4 billion (1.5 trillion Russian rubles) in its coal industry and port infrastructure, Novak told Putin. 

Russia’s oil production increased by 1.6 percent annually to 556 million tons last year, the energy minister said. Natural gas production beat an 18-year-old record as Russia produced 725 billion cubic meters of natural gas in 2018, raising production by around 5 percent compared to 2017, Novak told Putin. 

Due to the OPEC+ production cuts, Russia’s crude oil production in 2019 could be lower than originally planned—at 552 million tons, or 11.085 million bpd, Novak said last month after the new OPEC/non-OPEC deal was struck. Originally, plans for next year were for Russia’s oil production to stand at 555 million tons-556 million tons, or 11.145 million bpd-11.165 million bpd, according to Novak. 

—Oilprice.com

America’s “Generation Energy” has achieved something that seemed impossible: an increase in energy consumption coupled with a consistent decline in carbon dioxide emissions to the lowest in several decades. That’s what the chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute told a news conference at the annual State of American Energy address.

“Every generation has its own defining challenges, and its own defining accomplishments. We call this one ‘America’s Generation Energy’ because of a remarkable dual achievement: meeting record world energy demand while driving record CO2 emissions reductions. Thanks to America’s Generation Energy and its cutting-edge innovations, the U.S. energy outlook is stronger than ever,” Mike Sommers said.

Indeed, data from the World Bank shows that CO2 emissions in the United States fell to the lowest level in 50 years in 2012 on a per capita basis. At the same time, oil and gas production has been growing, especially in the last two decades thanks to the shale revolution. However, it’s worth noting that emissions have not been falling throughout these 50 years: there was a consistent decline over the three years to 2017 but now, CO2 data from emissions tracker Rhodium Group suggests, these may have actually risen in 2018, by 3.4 percent.

Sommers also praised the increase in U.S. crude oil exports, saying “Net oil imports this year are set to fall to their lowest levels since 1958. On some days, we actually export more oil than some OPEC nations produce. That’s a monumental shift in the global balance of energy power, and it’s paying off in communities across the nation – cutting family budgets and bringing manufacturing jobs back.”

Data from the Energy Information Administration shows U.S. crude oil exports hovered around the 2-million-bpd mark between May and October last year, dipping to 1.75 million bpd in August but recovering and rising to 2.326 million bpd in October.Related: Colombia’s Oil Rebound Off To A Rough Start In 2019

At the same time, imports, including from OPEC, stood at over 10 million bpd for all but two months in the May-October period, falling to 9.42 million bpd in October. In other words, the United States remains a net oil importer despite occasional peaks. Over the May-October 2018 period, crude oil imports from Canada alone were double the average rate of exports, at 4-4.55 million bpd.

Another outtake from the API’s annual State of American Energy address was a poll seeking to gauge the sentiments of Americans towards the domestic energy industry. The poll found that the overwhelming majority supported the growth in local crude oil and natural gas production and the increased development of energy infrastructure.

As much as 77 percent of the 1,000 participants in the survey said they supported policies in favor of the energy industry, according to API’s chief executive, with 90 percent seeing “personal value” in crude oil and natural gas. Some 83 percent saw oil and gas as “important for the future”.

The results of the poll are hardly a surprise, despite a lot of vocal opposition to pipelines and drilling on federal lands. Rising local production of oil and gas has had an overall positive effect on household spending and as the poll suggests most people are happy about it whatever the side effects of more drilling environmentalists protest against may be.

—Oilprice.com

“The oil market looks to be broadly balanced in 2019, an improvement on 2018 which turned out oversupplied,” Morgan Stanley analysts Martijn Rats and Amy Sergeant wrote in a note. “This supports a partial oil price recovery.”

The investment bank says that the plunge in oil prices has “overshot,” with the selloff having been magnified in December due to the global financial turmoil.

To be sure, the fundamentals did turn negative, with weaker expectations for demand, weaker time spreads in the futures market, and higher inventories. In the short run, the ramp up of OPEC+ supply before the December decision to slash output will take time to filter through the market.

Morgan Stanley argues that a similar thing happened the first time around when OPEC+ agreed to cut production at the start of 2017. Producers ramped up output in the weeks and months ahead of the deal, and that new oil set sail just ahead of the implementation of cuts.

As a result, in the first half of 2017, inventories barely budged, even as production fell. It took several months before all of those additional barrels arrived at their destination and became integrated into storage facilities, and ultimately worked off by the market. It wasn’t until the second half of 2017 that visible inventory data began to demonstrate significant declines. Morgan Stanley says a similar thing might happen this year, which could cap oil prices at $65 per barrel.Related: The 3 Continents Driving Global Energy Demand

Floating storage has already begun to creep up, and the corresponding deterioration of timespreads has also occurred. The Brent forward curve has moved more sharply into contango recently, a situation in which near-term prices trade at a discount to longer-dated futures. Both floating storage and the contango are symptoms of a marker that is well- or over-supplied. The OPEC+ cuts are phasing in, but will take time to have an impact. Morgan Stanley slashed its oil price forecast by $8 per barrel, expecting Brent to average $61 this year, down from a previous estimate of $69. But the investment bank does see a “partial rebound” of Brent oil prices into the mid-$60s. The bank says that the oil market was oversupplied by about 0.6 mb/d in 2018, but things look better this year. “With demand growth in 2019 of ~1.2 mb/d and year-on-year decline in OPEC supply of 1.1 mb/d, offset by non-OPEC growth of ~1.6 mb/d, we expect supply and demand to be broadly in equilibrium over the year, an improvement over 2018,” Morgan Stanley concluded.

Of course, the situation is dynamic. The decision of OPEC+ to slash output will help boost prices, but that also makes it less likely that U.S. shale growth will slow. In 2020, shale output is expected to grow by even more, after the inauguration of new pipelines unlock new supply later this year. Wood Mackenzie and Rystad Energy both see non-OPEC output growth of between 2 and 3 mb/d in 2020, which will exceed total global demand growth. That suggests that the OPEC+ cuts might need to remain in effect beyond this year, although that also means the cartel cedes even more market share. It’s a riddle that Saudi Arabia and its partners will be hard pressed to figure out.

Related: OPEC’s No.2 Boosted Production, Exports Just Before Cuts Began

One consequence of U.S. shale continuing to grow while OPEC+ countries keep barrels off of the market is the increasing shift towards lighter oils in the global crude slate. Oil from West Texas tends to be light, while barrels from Saudi Arabia are more of the medium variety. Prices for gasoline and naptha have grown increasingly weak – a result of the surging supply of light oil. Meanwhile, medium and heavy supplies are less abundant, and diesel prices reflect that.

This light/heavy disparity could grow as the year wears on, with the impending regulations on marine fuels from the International Maritime Organization (IMO) set to take effect at the start of 2020. The IMO rules will force dirty fuel oil out of the mix for ship-owners, and diesel and other distillates will be called upon to fill the void. Analysts have long predicted that the IMO rules could drive up global crude oil prices.

For now, WTI is trading just above $51 per barrel and Brent at $61. Analysts are not suggesting a return of last year’s price levels, but the consensus seems to be that the late-December plunge went too far. “We think the rally in oil prices has further to run in Q1,” Standard Chartered wrote in a note on January 10.

—Oilprice.com

Goldman Sachs reduced its outlook for oil prices this year citing abundant supply, Bloomberg reports, quoting a note to clients.

The investment bank’s analysts now expect Brent crude to average US$62.50 a barrel this year, down from an earlier projection of US$70 a barrel. West Texas Intermediate, according to Goldman Sachs, will average US$55.50 a barrel, compared with an earlier estimate of US$64.50 a barrel.

The price outlook revision was motivated by expectations of another glut despite the OPEC+ production cuts aimed at removing 1.2 million bpd from the global market and continued growth in U.S. shale oil production, as well as higher output in Brazil and Canada.

The bank’s analysts said, with regard to their expectations of oversupply, that OPEC produced a lot more crude oil in the last months of 2018, which means the cartel begins 2019 with more total production than it had at the beginning of last year, when larger production cuts were in effect.

What’s more, the Goldman analysts noted, pipeline bottlenecks in the Permian, which have pressured WTI previously, will likely clear faster than expected, driving a price rise in the U.S. benchmark.

“We expect that the oil market will balance at a lower marginal cost in 2019 given higher inventory levels to start the year, the persistent beat in 2018 shale production growth amidst little observed cost inflation, weaker than previously expected demand growth expectations (even at our above consensus forecasts) and increased low-cost production capacity,” analyst Daniel Courvalin wrote in the note.

The forecast update, however, comes days after the latest quarterly Dallas Fed Energy Survey revealed business activity in the U.S. oil and gas sector slowed down considerably in the fourth quarter of the year as benchmark oil prices plunged by over a quarter, suggesting shale oil production growth may slow down in 2019.

—Oilprice.com

Natural gas prices have fallen sharply after spiking to multi-year highs in late 2018, and prices could fall further still.

The U.S. entered the peak winter demand season with gas inventories at a 15-year low, which left the natural gas markets vulnerable to unexpected bouts of cold weather. In November, Henry Hub natural gas prices jumped as high as $4.80/MMBtu, the highest price in roughly four years. The combination of low inventories, structural increases in gas demand from new power plants and exports, and the seasonal spike in demand from cold weather, led to a sharp and sudden spike.

But sky-high prices did not last long. By mid-December, natural gas prices were back below $4/MMBtu, and by early January, prices had fallen back to $3/MMBtu.

Inventories are still significantly below the five-year average. As of the last week in December, gas storage levels stood at 2,705 billion cubic feet (bcf), according to the EIA, or 450 bcf lower than at the same point a year earlier and 560 bcf below the five-year average. In other words, prices fell despite the fact that the total amount of natural gas in storage is historically low. Prices came down at least in part because January has started off with mild weather, easing pressure on supplies.

Another reason why natural gas prices fell back is precisely because prices rose to painfully high levels. Utilities dialed back on gas-fired generation, while coal plants ramped up operations. As such, there is somewhat of an automatic cap on prices if they rise too high. Demand destruction and generation alternatives ease pressure on gas markets.Related: Has U.S. Fracking Activity Peaked Already?

(Click to enlarge)

Yet another reason why gas prices fell back from November’s highs was because of financial positioning from speculators. Hedge funds and other money managers bought up bullish positions in the weeks and months preceding the November price spike. Once prices rose close to $5/MMBtu sentiment began to shift. Utilities began to curtail gas generation, mild weather moved in, and the cycle seemed to head in the other direction. Investors sold off their bullish positions, which helped drag prices down.

But prices could fall even further. In fact, Bank of America Merrill Lynch argues that there could even be “congestion” at storage facilities as soon as this summer. “Looking into the months ahead, continued mild weather this winter could bring forward the risk of storage congestion to summer 2019, putting the forward curve at risk of even lower prices,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch wrote in a note.

Downward pricing pressure could continue in the weeks ahead. Current weather models put U.S. natural gas demand at roughly 10 bcf per day (bcf/d) below average for the first half of January, “bailing out ill prepared consumers,” BofAML wrote.

Even if the mercury does plunge unexpectedly, which would drain U.S. natural gas storage levels down to historically low levels, it may not be too much of a problem. “Cold weather during the balance of winter could lead to total inventories near 1.2 tcf by end of March, but is unlikely to be much of a concern given robust injections expected this summer,” BofAML said.Related: Who Are The Biggest Winners In The East-Med Gas Game?

In other words, U.S. natural gas drillers are breaking records and are expected to replenish depleted storage levels in short order. The Marcellus and Utica shales continue to see explosive production growth. In January, the EIA forecasts output in the Appalachia region to hit 31,451 mcf/d, up 414 mcf/d from a month earlier.

(Click to enlarge)

The Permian too is seeing rapid production growth. The EIA expects gas output in the Permian to jump to 12,736 mcf/d in January, up 258 mcf/d from December. Gas supply in the Permian has grown so quickly that the region’s pipelines are ill-equipped to handle the rush of new volumes. The wave of fresh gas supply has at times pushed regional natural gas prices in West Texas below zero.

The Permian is also home to an epidemic of gas flaring. According to the FT and data from Rystad Energy, natural gas flaring in the Permian hit 209 mcf/d in 2017, a figure that ballooned to 407 mcf/d in the third quarter of 2018. Flaring levels are soaring, and could rise to as much as 600 mcf/d by the second quarter of this year. Wasted gas is an environmental disaster, but there is no sign that the problem will be resolved anytime soon.

Meanwhile, surging gas production should prevent a rerun of last year’s price spike. As seasonal demand begins to ebb in a few months as temperatures rise, pressure on inventories and supply will likely fade. That leaves little room for prices to rise from current levels.

—Oilprice.com

Crude prices finished off the year with a small rally, and analysts are suggesting oil could climb even higher in the coming months. 

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

Wall Street: Oil prices will rebound.Most major investment banks are forecasting a rebound in oil prices in 2019. Price forecasts vary widely, but most have both WTI and Brent above current spot prices. Bank of America Merrill Lync, for instance, sees WTI averaging $59 per barrel in 2019. Citi is at the bearish end with a $49 price target. For Brent, Barclays says the benchmark will average $72, and a half dozen other investment banks have price estimates within a few dollars of that price.

Financial volatility continues. After suffering steep losses at the start of the week, financial markets rallied strongly on Wednesday and into Thursday, regaining all the lost ground from Monday. Weak industrial data from China released this week still shows signs of a slowdown. 

Saudi shakeup leaves MbS still in control. King Salman reshuffled the Saudi cabinet on Thursday, swapping out top security personnel. But the maneuvers did not remove power from crown prince Mohammed bin Salman. The officials that were elevated are close to MbS.

Formal OPEC+ structure looks doubtful. After suggesting multiple times earlier this year that OPEC and its non-OPEC partners – led by Russia – would formalize a permanent governance architecture to coordinate their efforts, the group is now downplaying such a development. Russia’s energy minister Alexander Novak said that the increase in red tape, plus antitrust risks from the U.S. government, make the idea too risky. “There is a consensus that there will be no such organisation. That’s because it requires additional bureaucratic brouhaha in relation to financing, cartel, with the U.S. side,” Novak told reporters. Instead, Novak said they will continue to cooperate without institutionalizing the arrangement. “This won’t be an organisation, this is some mechanism of cooperation: to convene, to discuss, adopt some memorandums, joint resolutions,” Novak.

Bank of England: Banks need to reduce climate risk. The head of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, says that banks need to do more to cleanse their balance sheets of climate risk. When asked by the FT if he is overstepping his institution’s remit, he dismissed that notion. “Absolutely not,” he said. “The issues around climate are wide ranging, and will touch virtually every sector.” He said banks are already modeling the financial risk from climate change and adjusting portfolios, though they need to do more. “They’re looking at specific climate-related risks in their portfolio, [such as] their exposure to certain bits of the auto sector,” he said. “Like it or not, this stuff is coming mainstream.”

Related: The Biggest Oilmen Of 2018

LNG shipments to Asia hit record. The volume of LNG shipments heading to Northeast Asia hit a record high in December, driven by demand from China and cold weather. LNG imports into the region – including China, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan – hit 20.5 million tonnes so far in December, or 5 percent higher than the previous monthly record.

Middle East oil producers hit by U.S. shale. As Bloomberg reports, U.S. shale is hitting major oil exporters from the Middle East on multiple fronts. For one, soaring production is lowering prices. But also, U.S. shipments of light crude to Asia are undercutting Saudi exports to the region. Moreover, U.S. exports of refined gasoline and naptha is creating a glut of those products in Asia, forcing prices lower.

Natural gas prices in Permian fell to zero, but rebounded. The glut of natural gas supply in the Permian basin – a byproduct of oil drilling – and the shortage of pipelines to take that gas to market, has led to a crash in prices. In November, natural gas prices traded near zero for much of the month, and even dipped into negative territory. Prices have since rebounded to $1.68/MMBtu in December. The inauguration of new oil pipelines next year could exacerbate the gas problem, as more takeaway capacity could lead to more drilling, which will lead to more gas production. “You’ll see things get worse and worse and worse as oil production grows and gas production grows alongside it,” J.R. Weston, an analyst for Raymond James & Associates Inc., told the Wall Street Journal.

Related: Mnuchin’s Bizarre Statement Rattles Markets

Shell plans on Vaca Muerta development. Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A) said that it plans to begin development of shale oil fields in Argentina after selling off refinery and retail fuel stations. Shell’s Vaca Muerta assets could produce 70,000 bpd by 2025.

Canadian production cuts set to take effect. Alberta’s mandatory 325,000-bpd cuts take effect in January. The decision to force companies to lower output has already provided a jolt to Canadian heavy oil prices. The province believes the full cuts only need to be in place for the first three months of the year. Thereafter, the province will try to unwind the cuts but do so in a way that corresponds with takeaway capacity.

EV sales in Norway reach 60 percent. Between September and November, 60 percent of all new vehicle sales in Norway were electric. EVs are rapidly gaining market share. In 2013, EVs had 3 percent of the market, but by 2017 that share reached 39 percent. For the full year of 2018, the figure looks set to be about 48 percent, even as EV sales accelerated in the final months of the year. Rystad Energy sees EVs capturing 90 percent of the market in Norway by 2022 and 100 percent by 2025.

—Oilprice

Saudi Arabia’s oil exports plummeted in the last month of 2018, reassuring oil markets that OPEC’s de facto leader may have enough fortitude to carry the water of the cartel in lowering global oil inventories.

The Kingdom’s oil exports in December fell by 500,000 barrels per day in December, according to tanker tracker data compiled by Bloomberg, with most of the decrease coming off China and the United States, the latter which has the most-watched oil inventories in the world. The United Arab Emirates also showed fewer oil exports in December.

Data from S&P Global Platts’ cFlow software estimated that Saudi’s oil exports fell to 7.523 million bpd in December, down from 8.162 million barrels per day in November.

Oil prices plunged in the last month of the year as the market viewed with skepticism OPEC’s agreement with non-OPEC allies to reduce oil production by 1.2 million barrels per day, with OPEC responsible for 800,000 bpd of that 1.2 million.

Minister for Planning says it is of great importance that Ghana expedites the processes needed to build its own gas pipelines.

Prof. George Gyan-Baffour noted that such infrastructure will reduce Ghana’s dependence on the West African Gas Pipeline, which is currently used to transport gas from Nigeria to Ghana.

His comments follow recent negotiations between Ghana and the West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (WAPCo), as well as the West African Gas Pipeline Authority (WAGPA) to reduce the cost of gas transported to Ghana.

Commenting on the matter, Professor Gyan-Baffour stated that locally owned gas pipelines will in the long-run influence the cost of gas, which will eventually impact the cost of power to Ghanaians.

“A lot of people are thinking that yes in the short term Ghana should get the cost of gas transported via the West African Gas Pipeline reduced. But in the long run we may have to have our own gas pipeline, to ensure that we don’t have to rely so much on their gas pipeline.”

He added that the time for the pipeline is now—since further delays will cost the country.

“We need it very quickly. When we have our own gas and maybe we want to move it from the western part to the eastern part of the country, you can do that at will without having to depend on somebody’s pipeline. In the long run my view is that we need to have our own parallel gas pipeline to ensure that there is continuous flow,” he intimated.

—CBOD News